首页> 外文OA文献 >The International Health Regulations 10 Years On: The Governing Framework for Global Health Security
【2h】

The International Health Regulations 10 Years On: The Governing Framework for Global Health Security

机译:《国际卫生条例十年》:全球卫生安全管理框架

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The World Health Organization (WHO) and its global health security treaty, the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) have lost the world\u27s confidence after the West African Ebola epidemic. The epidemic led to several high-level reviews of the IHR and global health security more broadly. Here, we propose a series of recommendations for operational and legal reforms to enhance the functioning of the FCGH. It is critical that WHO act on them quickly, before the window of opportunity for fundamental reform closes.WHO should ensure that all states fulfill their obligations to develop national core surveillance and response capacities, including through funding, possibly through additional assessed contributions, and an independent peer-review assessment process, with assessments identifying gaps and strategies and financing to fill those gaps. Civil society could also participate in ensure the validity of assessments. Independent assessments will improve confidence in the IHR, as would increasing the transparency of Emergency Committees deliberations, supplemented by an independent body to review disease data and offer recommendations to the WHO Director-General.States might more promptly notify WHO of events that may constitute public health emergencies of international concern with enhanced training and if the IHR\u27s decision instrument is amended to make more diseases automatically notifiable. WHO should also further encourage and facilitate reporting from non-governmental sources. A harmonized, gradient system for health emergencies would also bring greater clarity to disease response, while maintaining the power of a declaration of a public health emergency of international concern.To improve compliance with temporary recommendations and deter harmful additional measures, WHO could use public pressure, acknowledging compliance while publicly naming states parties and businesses that fail to comply, along with requesting justification for additional measures. States could use dispute mediation, arbitration, or other legal procedures, such as through the World Trade Organization, to discourage harmful trade and travel restrictions. And to advance a One Health approach, based on the links between human, animal, and environmental health, WHO should increase its use of cooperative agreements with other intergovernmental bodies, while integrating the Pandemic Influenza Pandemic Framework with the IHR to encourage equitable sharing of vaccines and therapies.
机译:在西非埃博拉疫情爆发后,世界卫生组织(WHO)及其全球卫生安全条约(《国际卫生条例(2005)》(IHR))使世界失去了信心。这一流行病导致对《国际卫生条例》和全球卫生安全进行了更广泛的几次高级别审查。在这里,我们为运营和法律改革提出了一系列建议,以增强FCGH的功能。至关重要的是,在基本改革的机会之窗关闭之前,世卫组织必须迅速采取行动,世卫组织应确保所有国家履行其发展国家核心监测和应对能力的义务,包括通过提供资金,可能通过额外分摊会费以及独立的同行评审评估流程,评估可以找出差距和战略,并提供资金来弥补这些差距。民间社会也可以参与确保评估的有效性。独立评估将提高对《国际卫生条例》的信心,增加应急委员会审议工作的透明度,并辅之以独立机构审查疾病数据并向世卫组织总干事提出建议。加强培训,并修订《国际卫生条例》的决策工具,使更多的疾病可以自动通报,则国际关注的突发卫生事件。世卫组织还应进一步鼓励和促进非政府组织的报告。卫生突发事件的统一梯度系统还将使疾病应对更加清晰,同时保持宣布国际关注的突发公共卫生事件的权力。 ,在公开命名未遵守的缔约国和企业的同时确认遵守情况,并要求采取其他措施的理由。各国可以使用争端调解,仲裁或其他法律程序,例如通过世界贸易组织,以劝阻有害的贸易和旅行限制。为了在人,动物和环境健康之间的联系基础上推进“单一健康”方法,世卫组织应增加与其他政府间机构的合作协议的使用,同时将大流行性流感大流行框架与《国际卫生条例》相结合,以鼓励公平共享疫苗和疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号